On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 11:32 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> So I'm now good with the idea of just not failing.  I don't like
> the patch as presented though.  First, the cfbot is quite rightly
> complaining about the "uninitialized variable" warning it draws.
> Second, I don't see a good reason to tie the change to logical
> replication in any way.  Let's just change the Assert to an if(),
> as attached.
>

LGTM. I don't know if it is a good idea to omit the test case for this
scenario. If required, we can reuse the test case from Sawada-San's
patch in the email [1].

[1] - 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoDKA%2BMB4M9BOnct_%3DZj5bNHbkYn6oKZ2aOQp8m%3D3x2GhQ%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.


Reply via email to