Hi, On 2022-10-31 11:05:32 +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > What do you think of my ResourceOwner refactoring patches [1]? Reminded by > this, I rebased and added it to the upcoming commitfest again.
> With that patch, all resources are stored in the same array and hash. The > array is part of ResourceOwnerData, so it saves the allocation overhead, > like the "initialarr" that you suggested. And it always uses the array for > recently remembered resources, and spills over to the hash for more > long-lived resources. > > Andres, could you repeat your benchmark with [1], to see if it helps? > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2e10b71b-352e-b97b-1e47-658e2669c...@iki.fi Just for future readers of this thread: Replied on the other thread. It does seem to address the performance issue, but I have some architectural concerns. Greetings, Andres Freund
