On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 6:01 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On 2022-Oct-24, Richard Guo wrote: > > ISTM the savepointLevel always remains the same as what is in > > TopTransactionStateData after looking at the codes. Now I also get > > confused. Maybe what we want is nestingLevel? > > This has already been discussed: > https://postgr.es/m/1317297307-sup-7...@alvh.no-ip.org > Now that we have transaction-controlling procedures, I think the next > step is to add the SQL-standard feature that allows savepoint level > control for them, which would make the savepointLevel no longer dead > code. Now I see the context. Thanks for pointing that out. Thanks Richard
