On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:08 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Never mind. There was a lot of items especially at the last CommitFest.
>
>> In terms of moving forward, I'd still like to hear what
>> Andres has to say about the comments I made on March 1st.
>
> Yeah, agreed.

$ ping -n andres.freund
Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
Request timeout for icmp_seq 1
Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
Request timeout for icmp_seq 3
Request timeout for icmp_seq 4
^C
--- andres.freund ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss

Meanwhile, 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4c171ffe-e3ee-acc5-9066-a40d52bc5...@postgrespro.ru
shows that this patch has some benefits for other cases, which is a
point in favor IMHO.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Reply via email to