On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 5:37 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I came across a couple of places in the planner that are checking > for nonempty havingQual; but since these bits run after > const-simplification of the HAVING clause, that produces the wrong > answer for a constant-true HAVING clause (which'll be folded to > empty). Correct code is to check root->hasHavingQual instead.
+1. root->hasHavingQual is set before we do any expression preprocessing. It should be the right one to check with. Thanks Richard
