> On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 at 16:30, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > One other point to discuss: should we consider back-patching? I've > > got mixed feelings about that myself. I don't think that cases where > > this helps significantly are at all mainstream, so I'm kind of leaning > > to "patch HEAD only".
At Mon, 10 Oct 2022 13:24:34 +0100, Simon Riggs <simon.ri...@enterprisedb.com> wrote in > It looks fine to eventually backpatch, since StandbyReleaseLockTree() > was optimized to only be called when the transaction had actually done > some AccessExclusiveLocks. > > So the performance loss is minor and isolated to the users of such > locks, so I see no problems with it. At Wed, 5 Oct 2022 12:00:55 -0700, Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote in > +1. It can always be back-patched in the future if there are additional > reports. The third +1 from me. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
