Hi hackers,

I find there are some unnecessary commas for goto lables,
attached a patch to remove them.

-- 
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.

>From 3ac7d03e1c5d81e883406ac62fafbe7e7d32fd1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Japin Li <japi...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2022 07:35:43 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] Remove unnecessary commas for goto labels

---
 src/backend/access/transam/slru.c      | 2 +-
 src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/slru.c b/src/backend/access/transam/slru.c
index b65cb49d7f..6c57fae312 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/slru.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/slru.c
@@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@ SimpleLruTruncate(SlruCtl ctl, int cutoffPage)
 	 */
 	LWLockAcquire(shared->ControlLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 
-restart:;
+restart:
 
 	/*
 	 * While we are holding the lock, make an important safety check: the
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c
index 04454ad6e6..447f7bc2fb 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c
@@ -1373,7 +1373,7 @@ ExecDelete(ModifyTableContext *context,
 		 * special-case behavior needed for referential integrity updates in
 		 * transaction-snapshot mode transactions.
 		 */
-ldelete:;
+ldelete:
 		result = ExecDeleteAct(context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, changingPart);
 
 		switch (result)
@@ -1855,7 +1855,7 @@ ExecUpdateAct(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo,
 	 * then trigger.c will have done table_tuple_lock to lock the correct
 	 * tuple, so there's no need to do them again.)
 	 */
-lreplace:;
+lreplace:
 
 	/* ensure slot is independent, consider e.g. EPQ */
 	ExecMaterializeSlot(slot);
@@ -2686,7 +2686,7 @@ ExecMergeMatched(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo,
 	econtext->ecxt_innertuple = context->planSlot;
 	econtext->ecxt_outertuple = NULL;
 
-lmerge_matched:;
+lmerge_matched:
 
 	/*
 	 * This routine is only invoked for matched rows, and we must have found
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to