Firstly, thank you for your reply. Yeah, I think maybe just assigning tts_tableOid of TTS only once during scanning the same table may be better. That really needs to be thinked over.
Regards, Wenchao Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> 于2022年9月28日周三 10:47写道： > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 11:51 PM Wenchao Zhang <zwcpostg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > We can get the two assigned values are same by reading codes. Maybe we > should remove one? > > > > What's more, we find that maybe we assign slot->tts_tableOid in outer > interface like table_scan_getnextslot may be better and more friendly when > we import other pluggable storage formats. > > I suppose that you're right; it really should happen in exactly one > place, based on some overarching theory about how tts_tableOid works > with the table AM interface. I just don't know what that theory is. > > -- > Peter Geoghegan >
