Greetings, * Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com) wrote: > On 27.09.22 03:37, Andres Freund wrote: > > Maybe we should rely on PATH, rather than hardcoding OS dependent locations? > > Or at least fall back to seach binaries in PATH? Seems pretty odd to > > hardcode > > all these locations without a way to influence it from outside the test. > > Homebrew intentionally does not install the krb5 and openldap packages into > the path, because they conflict with macOS-provided software. However, those > macOS-provided variants don't provide all the pieces we need for the tests.
The macOS-provided versions are also old and broken, or at least that was the case when I looked into them last. > Also, on Linux you need /usr/sbin, which is often not in the path. > > So I think there is no good way around hardcoding a lot of these paths. Yeah, not sure what else to do. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
