On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 04:50:36PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > You are right. bool is not usually a problem in a signal handler, but > sig_atomic_t is the type we ought to use. I'll go adjust that.
Done this one. I have scanned the code, but did not notice a similar mistake. It is worth noting that we have only one remaining "volatile bool" in the headers now. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
