On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:57:58AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > +1 because callers don't use returned StringInfo structure outside of > build_backup_content(). The patch looks good to me.
Thanks for looking. > I think it will be > good to add a note about the caller freeing up the retired string's > memory [1], just in case. Not sure that this is worth it. It is fine to use palloc() in a dedicated memory context, for one. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature