Greetings, * Wolfgang Walther (walt...@technowledgy.de) wrote: > Robert Haas: > > I don't think we're going to be very happy if we redefine inheriting > > the privileges of another role to mean inheriting only some of them. > > That seems pretty counterintuitive to me. I also think that this > > particular definition is pretty fuzzy. > > Scratch my previous suggestion. A new, less fuzyy definition would be: > Ownership is not a privilege itself and as such not inheritable.
One of the reasons the role system was brought into being was explicitly to allow other roles to have ownership-level rights on objects that they didn't directly own. I don't see us changing that. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
