On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 02:11:36PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 1:14 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Presumably a >> generic WAL record compression mechanism could be reused for other large >> records, too. That could be much easier than devising a deduplication >> strategy for every record type. > > It's quite possible that that's a good idea, but that should probably > work as an additive thing. That's something that I think of as a > "clever technique", whereas I'm focussed on just not being naive in > how we represent this one specific WAL record type.
Got it. I think that's a fair point. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
