Hi Amit, > I think it is better to use Size. Even though, it may not fail now as > the size of names for origin will always be much lesser but it is > better if we are consistent. If we agree with this, then as a first > patch, we can make it to use Size in existing places and then > introduce this new function.
OK, here is the updated patchset. * 0001 replaces int's with Size's in the existing code * 0002 applies Peter's patch on top of 0001 -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
v2-0001-Pass-Size-as-a-2nd-argument-for-snprintf-in-table.patch
Description: Binary data
v2-0002-Add-common-function-ReplicationOriginName.patch
Description: Binary data
