Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2022-09-16 11:40:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I suspect this is less about clang and more about LLVM APIs,
>> but anyway it seems like we gotta fix something.
> Yea, there's definitely a bunch of llvm 15 issues that need to be fixed - this
> particular failure is pretty easy to fix, but there's some others that are
> harder. They redesigned a fairly core part of the IR representation. Thomas
> has a WIP fix, I think.
I'm more and more getting the feeling that we're interfacing with LLVM
at too low a level, because it seems like our code is constantly breaking.
Do they just not have any stable API at all?
regards, tom lane
