>>>>> "Chapman" == Chapman Flack <c...@anastigmatix.net> writes:
Chapman> It seemed to me at the time to be not hard to implement, even Chapman> just as an extension for proof of concept. One small obstacle Chapman> is that the check hook on a variable doesn't get called during Chapman> attempted RESET, so the only way to block a prohibited RESET Chapman> would have to be from an assign hook, which isn't expected to Chapman> fail. It could surely throw an error, but which would mess up Chapman> the whole RESET, but might be tolerable. Assign hooks aren't allowed to throw errors under any circumstance because they're called during transaction abort, and throwing an error during abort is obviously not tolerable. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
