> On 15 Sep 2022, at 15:13, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2022-Sep-15, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>
>> Em qui., 15 de set. de 2022 às 09:50, Alvaro Herrera <
>> alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> escreveu:
>
>>> These functions you are patching are not in performance-sensitive code,
>>> so I doubt this makes any difference performance wise. I doubt
>>> Microsoft will ever remove these deprecated functions, given its history
>>> of backwards compatibility, so from that perspective this change does
>>> not achieve anything either.
>>
>> If users don't adapt to the new API, the old one will never really expire.
>
> If you are claiming that Microsoft will remove the old API because
> Postgres stopped using it, ... sorry, no.
Also, worth noting is that these functions aren't actually deprecated. The
note in the docs state:
The local functions have greater overhead and provide fewer features
than other memory management functions. New applications should use
the heap functions unless documentation states that a local function
should be used.
And following the bouncing ball into the documentation they refer to [0] I read
this:
As a result, the global and local families of functions are equivalent
and choosing between them is a matter of personal preference.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
[0]:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/memory/global-and-local-functions
