On Tue, 2022-09-13 at 11:47 +0300, Nikita Malakhov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:06 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at>
> wrote:
> > Shouldn't such tuples be considered dead right away, even if the inserting
> > transaction is still active? That would allow cleaning them up even before
> > the transaction is done.
> >
> > There is this code in HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuumHorizon:
> >
> > else if
> > (TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(HeapTupleHeaderGetRawXmin(tuple)))
> > {
> > [...]
> > /* inserted and then deleted by same xact */
> > if
> > (TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(HeapTupleHeaderGetUpdateXid(tuple)))
> > return HEAPTUPLE_DELETE_IN_PROGRESS;
> >
> > Why HEAPTUPLE_DELETE_IN_PROGRESS and not HEAPTUPLE_DEAD?
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, despite tuples being inserted and deleted by
> the same
> transaction - they are visible inside the transaction and usable by it, so
> considering them
> dead and cleaning up during execution is a bad idea until the transaction is
> ended.
But once they are deleted or updated, even the transaction that created them
cannot
see them any more, right?
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
