At Tue, 13 Sep 2022 15:45:07 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote in > At Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:51:56 -0700, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote > in > > This sees a tad misleading - the previous snapshot wasn't borken, right? > > I saw it kind of broken that ->xip contains sub transactions. But I > didn't meant it's broken by "correct". Is "proper" suitable there?
No. It's not broken if it is takenDuringRecovery. So this flag can be used to notify that xip can be oversized. I realized that rbtxn_is_known_subxact is not reliable. I'm redirecting to oversized xip. Pleas wait for a while. regareds. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
