On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 16:26 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> In other words, omitting
> GRANTED BY is the same as specifying "GRANTED BY current_user".
Let me correct this thinko to distinguish between specifying GRANTED BY
and not:
* Let the granting user be the one specified in the GRANTED BY clause
if it exists; otherwise the current user.
* If the granting user has privileges to be the grantor (ADMIN OPTION
for roles, GRANT OPTION for other objects) then the granting user is
the grantor.
* Else if GRANTED BY was *not* specified, infer the grantor:
- If the granting user inherits from a role with the privileges
to be the grantor, then it selects a role with the fewest inheritance
hops as the grantor.
- Else if the current user is any superuser, the grantor is the top
"owner" (bootstrap superuser for roles; object owner for other objects)
* Else error (or if an error would break important backwards
compatibility, silently make it work like before and perhaps issue a
WARNING).
The basic idea is to use superuser privileges as a last resort in order
to maximize the cases that work normally (independent of superuser-
ness).
Regards,
Jeff Davis
