On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:57:53AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> I think renumbering this makes sense. We could just leave the comment >> as is if we don't come up with a better wording. > > +1, I see no need to change the comment. We just need to establish > the precedent that values within the GUC_UNIT_MEMORY field can be > chosen sequentially.
+1. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
