On 9/1/22 16:05, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > On 9/1/22 9:06 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> >> >> On 8/30/22 15:15, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: >>> On 8/18/22 3:29 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 8/18/22 03:32, David Rowley wrote: >>> >>>>> Here are a couple of patches to demo the idea. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, that's an option too. I should have mentioned it along with the >>>> cpu_operator_cost. >>>> >>>> BTW would you mind taking a look at the costing? I think it's fine, but >>>> it would be good if someone not involved in the patch takes a look. >>> >>> With RMT hat on, just a friendly reminder that this is still on the open >>> items list[1] -- we have the Beta 4 release next week and it would be >>> great if we can get this resolved prior to it. >>> >> >> I know. I'll fix this by tweaking one of the cost gucs, mentioned by >> David. > > Great -- thanks for the update! >
I've pushed the fix to 15+master. In the end I just used David's patches that set parallel_setup_cost to 0. regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
