On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 12:25 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 01:52:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > I can't get too excited about this. All of the error exit paths in > > backend authentication code will lead immediately to process exit, so > > the possibility of some memory being leaked really has no consequences > > worth worrying about. If we *were* worried about it, sprinkling a few > > more ldap_msgfree() calls into the existing code would hardly make it > > more bulletproof. > > Even if this is not critical in the backend for this authentication > path, I'd like to think that it is still a good practice for future > code so as anything code-pasted around would get the call. So I see > no reason to not put smth on HEAD at least. > Hi, Here is updated patch as you suggested in your previous email. Thanks
v2-ldap-msg-free.patch
Description: Binary data
