On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 1:29 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Hi John, > > Are you planning to press ahead with these?
I was waiting for feedback on the latest set, so tomorrow I'll see about the FIXME and remove the leftover bogus include. I was thinking of applying the guc-file patches separately and then squashing the rest since they're *mostly* mechanical: > > Subject: [PATCH v4 01/11] Preparatory refactoring for compiling guc-file.c > > standalone > > Subject: [PATCH v4 02/11] Move private declarations shared between guc.c and > > guc-file.l to new header > > Subject: [PATCH v4 03/11] Build guc-file.c standalone > > 01-03 are a bit more complicated, but still look not far off. There's a FIXME > about failing headercheck. -- John Naylor EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
