On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 10:42:45AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Given that 'optional, optional' has no independent meaning from > > 'optional'; it requires one to scan the entire set looking for > > the non-optional embedded in the option. So no gain. > > I originally had the same reaction Michael Paquier did, that having one > big optional block is nice, but seeing that 'CREATE DATABASE name WITH' > actually works, I can see the point in having our syntax be accurate, > and removing the outer optional brackets now does seem like an > improvement to me.
Backpatched to PG 10. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
