On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:29:05AM +0100, Greg Stark wrote: > Having this function would be great (I admit I never responded because > I never figured out if your suggestion was right or not:). But should > it also be added to the pg_stat_activity view? Perhaps even just in > the SQL view using the function. > > Alternately should pg_stat_activity show the actual temp schema name > instead of the id? I don't recall if it's visible outside the backend > but if it is, could pg_stat_activity show whether the temp schema is > actually attached or not?
I'm open to adding the backend ID or the temp schema name to pg_stat_activity, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that others aren't. It'd be great to hear a few more opinions on the idea before I spend too much time on the patches. IMO we should still adjust the pg_stat_get_backend_*() functions even if we do end up adjusting pg_stat_activity. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
