On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 9:30 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org>
wrote:

> On 2022-Aug-23, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> > However, it seems get_relation_idx_constraint_oid(), introduced in
> eb7ed3f3063,
> > assume there could be only ONE constraint depending to an index. But in
> fact,
> > multiple constraints can rely on the same index, eg.: the PK and a self
> > referencing FK. In consequence, when looking for a constraint depending
> on an
> > index for the given relation, either the FK or a PK can appears first
> depending
> > on various conditions. It is then possible to trick it make a FK
> constraint a
> > parent of a PK...
>
> Hmm, wow, that sounds extremely stupid.  I think a sufficient fix might
> be to have get_relation_idx_constraint_oid ignore any constraints that
> are not unique or primary keys.  I tried your scenario with the attached
> and it seems to work correctly.  Can you confirm?  (I only ran the
> pg_regress tests, not anything else for now.)
>
> If this is OK, we should make this API quirkiness very explicit in the
> comments, so the patch needs to be a few lines larger in order to be
> committable.  Also, perhaps the check should be that contype equals
> either primary or unique, rather than it doesn't equal foreign.
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —
> https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/


I was thinking of the following patch.
Basically, if there is only one matching constraint. we still return it.

diff --git a/src/postgres/src/backend/catalog/pg_constraint.c
b/src/postgres/src/backend/catalog/pg_constraint.c
index f0726e9aa0..ddade138b4 100644
--- a/src/postgres/src/backend/catalog/pg_constraint.c
+++ b/src/postgres/src/backend/catalog/pg_constraint.c
@@ -1003,7 +1003,8 @@ get_relation_idx_constraint_oid(Oid relationId, Oid
indexId)
  constrForm = (Form_pg_constraint) GETSTRUCT(tuple);
  if (constrForm->conindid == indexId)
  {
- constraintId = HeapTupleGetOid(tuple);
+ if (constraintId == InvalidOid || constrForm->confrelid == 0)
+ constraintId = HeapTupleGetOid(tuple);
  break;
  }
  }

Reply via email to