On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 03:17:33PM +1200, David Rowley wrote: > I'm probably not the only committer to want to run a mile when they > see someone posting 17 or 26 patches in an email. So maybe "bang for > buck" is a better method for getting the ball rolling here. As you > know, I was recently bitten by local shadows in af7d270dd, so I do > believe in the cause. > > What do you think?
You already fixed the shadow var introduced in master/pg16, and I sent patches for the shadow vars added in pg15 (marked as such and presented as 001-008), so perhaps it's okay to start with that ? BTW, one of the remaining warnings seems to be another buglet, which I'll write about at a later date. -- Justin
