On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 6:20 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > David Steele voted for back-patching this on the grounds that it would > > make future back-patching easier, which is an argument that seems to > > me to have some merit, although on the other hand, we are already into > > August so it's quite late in the day. Anyone else want to vote? > > Seems like low-risk refactoring, so +1 for keeping v15 close to HEAD.
+1, but I suggest also getting a hat-tip from the RMT on it. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
