On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 08:34, Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Am I still missing something?
No, you have found a dependency between the patches that I was unaware of. So there is no bug if you apply both patches. Thanks for looking. > So I still think some adjustment is required in XidInMVCCSnapdhot() That is one way to resolve the issue, but not the only one. I can also change AssignTransactionId() to recursively register parent xids for all of a subxid's parents. I will add in a test case and resolve the dependency in my next patch. Thanks again. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
