On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 01:19, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> writes: > > I chatted to Andres and Thomas about this last week and their view > > made me think it might not be quite as clear-cut as "just bump it up a > > bunch because it's ridiculously low" that I had in mind. They > > mentioned about file_fdw and another one that appears to work on > > mmapped segments, which I don't recall if any names were mentioned. > > Um ... DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST is postgres_fdw-specific, so I do not > see what connection some other FDW would have to it.
I should have devoted more brain cells to that one. Anyway, I started a thread at [1]. David [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/caaphdvopvjjfh5c1ed2hrvddfom2depmwwiu5-f1anmyprj...@mail.gmail.com
