On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 7:36 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > On 2022-Jul-29, Peter Smith wrote: > > > PSA v2 of this patch, modified as suggested. > > I don't object to doing this, but I think these two functions should > stay together nonetheless.
Hmm, I think there is some confusion because different people have mentioned multiple functions. AFAIK, the patch *does* ensure the 2 functions (is_publishable_class and is_publishable_relation) stay together. If you believe there is still a problem after applying the patch please explicitly name what function(s) you think should be moved. ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia