At Thu, 28 Jul 2022 09:56:33 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> wrote in
> Thanks Masahiko for the updated patch. It looks good to me.
>
> I wonder whether the logic should be, similar
> to ProcArrayApplyRecoveryInfo()
> if (xlrec->subxid_overflow)
> ...
> else if (xlrec->subxcnt > 0)
> ...
>
> But you may ignore it.
Either is fine if we asuume the record is sound, but since it is
debugging output, I think we should always output the information *for
both* . The following change doesn't change the output for a sound
record.
====
if (xlrec->subxcnt > 0)
{
appendStringInfo(buf, "; %d subxacts:", xlrec->subxcnt);
for (i = 0; i < xlrec->subxcnt; i++)
appendStringInfo(buf, " %u", xlrec->xids[xlrec->xcnt +
i]);
}
- else if (xlrec->subxid_overflow)
+ if (xlrec->subxid_overflow)
appendStringInfoString(buf, "; subxid overflowed");
====
Another point is if the xid/subxid lists get long, I see it annoying
that the "overflowed" messages goes far away to the end of the long
line. Couldn't we rearrange the item order of the line as the follows?
nextXid %u latestCompletedXid %u oldestRunningXid %u;[ subxid overflowed;][ %d
xacts: %u %u ...;][ subxacts: %u %u ..]
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
