Hi Sehrope,
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 17:22, Sehrope Sarkuni <sehr...@jackdb.com> wrote: > Idea here makes sense and I've seen this brought up repeatedly on the JDBC > lists. > > Does the driver need to be aware that this SET command was executed? I'm > wondering what happens if an end user executes this with an OID the driver > does not actually know how to handle. > I suppose there would be a failure to read the attribute correctly. > > > + Oid *tmpOids = palloc(length+1); > > ... > > + tmpOids = repalloc(tmpOids, length+1); > > These should be: sizeof(Oid) * (length + 1) > Yes they should, thanks! > > Also, I think you need to specify an explicit context via > MemoryContextAlloc or the allocated memory will be in the default context > and released at the end of the command. > Also good catch Thanks, Dave >
