Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes: > Maybe your idea of allowing arbitrary GUCs is not a bad one, something > like > %{search_path}G > (where we add a letter at the end just so we can add other things in the > future that aren't GUCs.)
I'm pretty uncomfortable about the amount of code that could potentially
be reached during an error logging attempt if we do that.
regards, tom lane
