> On 15 Apr 2018, at 09:36, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:27:19PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> Thinking more on this, I don’t think the -f option should be in the tool >> until >> we have the ability to turn on/off checksums. Since checksums are always on, >> or always off, -f is at best confusing IMO. The attached patch removes -f, >> when we can turn checksums on/off we can rethink how -f should behave. > > You have forgotten to update the list of arguments in getopt().
Doh. Thanks, fixed in attached patch. cheers ./daniel
remove_force-v2.patch
Description: Binary data
