btw, there are some typos in Patch v5, %s/ralation/relation/g On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:05 PM Aleksander Alekseev <aleksan...@timescale.com> wrote: > > Hi Amit, > > > Yeah, that's better. On again thinking about the function name, I > > wonder if validate_relation_type() suits here as there is no generic > > object being passed? > > Yep, validate_relation_type() sounds better. > > -- > Best regards, > Aleksander Alekseev
-- Regards Junwang Zhao
