On 2022-Jul-21, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:01 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> > wrote:
> > I've got no opinions on this. I don't like either 1 or 3, so I'm going > > to add and backpatch a new GUC allow_recovery_tablespaces as the > > override mechanism. > > > > If others disagree with this choice, please speak up. > > Would it help if we back-patched the allow_in_place_tablespaces stuff? > I'm not sure how hard/destabilising that would be, but I could take a > look tomorrow. Yeah, I think that would reduce cruft. I'm not sure this is more against backpatching policy or less, compared to adding a separate GUC just for this bugfix. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "The problem with the facetime model is not just that it's demoralizing, but that the people pretending to work interrupt the ones actually working." (Paul Graham)
