Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes: > That double eval macro wasn't nice. This time with a static inline function.
Seems like passing a size_t to pg_leftmost_one_pos32 isn't great.
It was just as wrong before (if the caller-supplied argument is
indeed a size_t), but no time like the present to fix it.
We could have pg_bitutils.h #define pg_leftmost_one_pos_size_t
as the appropriate one of pg_leftmost_one_pos32/64, perhaps.
regards, tom lane
