Hi! On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 4:47 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 01:53:21PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > Looks good to me as well. I'm going to push this if no objections. > > FWIW, I find the extra mention of PGOPTIONS with the specific point of > table AMs added within the part of the environment variables a bit > confusing, because we already mention PGOPTIONS for serializable > transactions a bit down. Hence, my choice would be the addition of an > extra paragraph in the "Notes", named "Table Access Methods", just > before or after "Good Practices". My 2c.
Thank you. Pushed applying the suggestion above. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov