On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 10:55:55PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > The/that inconsistency ... choose one. Or actually, the "an ... the" > > combination you used elsewhere doesn't grate on the ear either. > > > > + For each extension, refuse to drop anything if any objects (other > > than the > > + extensions listed) depend on it. However, its own member objects, > > and routines > > + that are explicitly dependent on this extension, are skipped. > > + This is the default. > > > > "skipped" seems like a horrible choice of word; it could easily be read as > > "they don't get dropped". I am not convinced that mentioning the member > > objects here is an improvement either. In the first sentence you are > > treating each extension as a monolithic object; why not in the second? > > I created a modified patch based on this feedback; patch attached. I > rewrote the last change.
Patch applied to PG 13 and later, where extension dependency was added. Thank you for the patch. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
