On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 11:18:43PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 08:11:36AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > > That said, I still think that the current wording should be tweak with > > respect > > to row vs. rows (especially if we continue to call it a table): > > > > Current: > > "The SET and WHERE clauses in ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE have access to the > > existing row using the table's name (or an alias), and to [rows] proposed > > for insertion using the special excluded table." > > > > Change [rows] to: > > > > "the row" > > > > > > I'm undecided whether "FROM excluded" should be something that works - but I > > also don't think it would actually be used in any case. > > I found two places where a singular "row" would be better, doc patch > attached.
Patch applied to all supported versions. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
