Hi, On 2022-07-08 17:05:49 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Actually, it's not the same name: JsonCoercionsState vs > JsonCoercionState. But I agree that it's a subtle enough difference that > we should use something more obvious. Maybe JsonCoercionStates instead > of JsonCoercionsState? The plural at the end would be harder to miss.
Given that it's a one-off use struct, why name it? Then we don't have to figure out a name we never use. I also still would like to understand why we need pre-allocated space for all these types. How could multiple datums be coerced in an interleaved manner? And if that's possible, why can't multiple datums of the same type be coerced at the same time? Greetings, Andres Freund
