> - -> Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 (actual rows=1960 loops=50) > + -> Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 (actual rows=1960.00
At the not inconsiderable risk of bike-shedding.... I'm wondering if printing something like 0.00 will be somewhat deceptive when the real value is non-zero but less than 1 row per 200 loops. I wonder if the number of decimal places should be calculated to produce a minimum of one non-zero digit for non-zero values. -- greg
