At Thu, 7 Jul 2022 01:11:33 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote in > > > On 2022/03/16 10:29, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > > At Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:19:13 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi > > <horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote in > >> In short, I split out the two topics other than checkpoint log to > >> other threads. > > So, this is about the main topic of this thread, adding LSNs to > > checkpint log. Other topics have moved to other treads [1], [2] , > > [3]. > > I think this is no longer controversial alone. So this patch is now > > really Read-for-Commiter and is waiting to be picked up. > > +1 > > + * ControlFileLock is not required as we are the only > + * updator of these variables. > > Isn't it better to add "at this time" or something at the end of the > comment because only we're not always updator of them? No?
Excluding initialization, (I believe) checkpointer is really the only updator of the variables/members. But I'm fine with the addition. > Barring any objection, I'm thinking to apply the above small change > and commit the patch. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center