On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 6:55 PM Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 03:22:38PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 1:30 PM Ashutosh Bapat > > <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > <para> > > > - If true, the stats include inheritance child columns, not just the > > > + If true, the stats include child tables, not just the > > > > > > We are replacing columns with tables; is that intentional? > > > > > > Partitioned tables do not have their own stats, it's just aggregated > > > partition stats. > > > ... > > > - If true, the stats include inheritance child columns, not just the > > > + If true, the stats include child childs, not just the > > > values in the specified relation > > > </para></entry> > > > </row> > > > @@ -13152,7 +13152,7 @@ SELECT * FROM pg_locks pl LEFT JOIN > > > pg_prepared_xacts ppx > > > <structfield>inherited</structfield> <type>bool</type> > > > </para> > > > <para> > > > - If true, this row includes inheritance child columns, not just the > > > + If true, this row includes child tables, not just the > > > values in the specified table > > > </para></entry> > > > </row> > > > > > > Replacing inheritance child "column" with "tables", is that intentional? > > > > I was a bit confused by these too, though perhaps the original text is > > not as clear as it could be? Would the following be a good rewrite: > > I updated the language to say "values from". Is this better ?
Yes. -- Thanks, Amit Langote EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
