Hi, On 2022-07-04 21:56:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > For non-parallel tests I think we currently print the test name before > > running > > the test, which obviously doesn't work well when needing to print the 'ok' > > 'not ok' first. > > Is this still a consideration? We got rid of serial_schedule some > time ago.
Not really for the main tests, there's a few serial steps, but not enough that a bit additional output would be an issue. I think all tests in contrib are serial though, and some have enough tests that it might be annoying? > > I wonder if for parallel tests we should print the test number based on the > > start of the test rather than the finish time? > > I think we need the test number to be stable, so it had better be the > ordering appearing in the schedule file. But we already print the > results in that order. I remembered some asynchronizity, but apparently that's just the "parallel group" line. Greetings, Andres Freund
