On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 09:23:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > In reviewing Peter's patch to auto-generate the backend/nodes > support files, I compared what the patch's script produces to > what is in the code now. I found several discrepancies in the > recently-added parse node types for JSON functions, and as far > as I can see every one of those discrepancies is an error in > the existing code. Some of them are relatively harmless > (e.g. COPY_LOCATION_FIELD isn't really different from > COPY_SCALAR_FIELD), but some of them definitely are live bugs. > I propose the attached patch.
Do the missing fields indicate a deficiency in test coverage ? _copyJsonTablePlan.pathname and _equalJsonTable.plan. -- Justin
