On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 10:29 PM Euler Taveira <eu...@eulerto.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2022, at 5:37 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: > > Yeah, it seems we have overlooked this point. I think we can do this > just for HEAD but as the feature is introduced in PG-15 so there is no > harm in pushing it to PG-15 as well especially because it is a > straightforward change. What do you or others think? > > No objection. It is a good thing for future backpatches. >
Since there is no function change or bugfix here I thought it was only applicable for HEAD. This change is almost in the same category as a code comment typo patch - do those normally get backpatched? - maybe follow the same convention here. OTOH, if you think it may be helpful for future backpatches then I am also fine if you wanted to push it to PG15. ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
