On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 03:43, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 12:41 AM Simon Riggs > <simon.ri...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > The reason to mention this now is that it would give more space than > > 56bit limit being suggested here. > > Isn't 2^56 enough, though?
For me, yes. To the above comment, I followed with: > I am not opposed to the current > patch, just finding ways to remove some objections mentioned by > others, if those became blockers. So it seems we can continue with the patch. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
